Student Employee of the Year

For this category, make sure to address the following criteria:

• How the student employee makes a distinctive contribution to the community with their work
• How the student employee's work makes an impact on the university and/or the university community—and how that impact will be felt even after the job is complete
• How the student employee works to inspire others to serve the university or community

For each criteria, the nominee will be assigned a score of:

1. Excellent (3 pts), if the nominator provided specific details and
   examples about how the student exceeded the criteria listed
2. Good (2 pts), if the nominator provided specific details and
   examples about how the student met the criteria listed
3. Fair (1 pt), if the nominator provided specific details about
   the nominee’s job contributions but did not clearly relate it to the criteria listed

For this category, make sure to address the following criteria:

• How the student employee demonstrates empathy and compassion for others in their work
• How the student employee understands the importance and ongoing commitment to DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) efforts in their work, campus, and/or community
• How the student employee looks for, or works for diversity in projects, discussions and problem solving at work

For each criteria, the nominee will be assigned a score of:

1. Excellent (3 pts), if the nominator provided specific details and
   examples about how the student exceeded the criteria listed
2. Good (2 pts), if the nominator provided specific details and
   examples about how the student met the criteria listed
3. Fair (1 pt), if the nominator provided specific details about
   the nominee’s job contributions but did not clearly relate it to the criteria listed

For this category, make sure to address the following criteria:

• How the student employee motivates and inspires others through encouragement and by building trust
• How the student employee strives to take the lead in workplace scenarios and is open to change and new ideas
• How the student employee is passionate in mentoring and training fellow student employees

For each criteria, the nominee will be assigned a score of:

1. Excellent (3 pts), if the nominator provided specific details and
   examples about how the student exceeded the criteria listed
2. Good (2 pts), if the nominator provided specific details and
   examples about how the student met the criteria listed
3. Fair (1 pt), if the nominator provided specific details about
   the nominee’s job contributions but did not clearly relate it to the criteria listed

For this category, make sure to address the following criteria:

• How the student employee uses technology to improve efficiency and productivity of their work and/or the work of the department
• How the student employee manages technology to integrate information to support relevant, effective, and timely decision making
• How the student employee develops useful ideas that are new, better, or unique

For each criteria, the nominee will be assigned a score of:

1. Excellent (3 pts), if the nominator provided specific details and
   examples about how the student exceeded the criteria listed
2. Good (2 pts), if the nominator provided specific details and
   examples about how the student met the criteria listed
3. Fair (1 pt), if the nominator provided specific details about
   the nominee’s job contributions but did not clearly relate it to the criteria listed

For this category, make sure to address the following criteria:

• How the student employee multitasks well in a fast-paced environment
• How the student employee makes decisions and solves problems using sound, inclusive reasoning and judgment
• How the student employee gathers and analyzes information from a diverse set of sources and individuals to fully understand a problem

For each criteria, the nominee will be assigned a score of:

1. Excellent (3 pts), if the nominator provided specific details and
   examples about how the student exceeded the criteria listed
2. Good (2 pts), if the nominator provided specific details and
   examples about how the student met the criteria listed
3. Fair (1 pt), if the nominator provided specific details about
   the nominee’s job contributions but did not clearly relate it to the criteria listed